News Release
Embargo till 14 October 2020, 5.16 pm Singapore/HK time
NetLink NBN Trust retains number 1 spot in Governance Index for Trusts (GIFT) 2020; overall average score drops partly due to raising of standards
SINGAPORE, 14 October 2020 – NetLink NBN Trust, which debuted at the top of the Governance Index for Trusts (GIFT) last year, has retained its top ranking this year.
This year, the governance and business risk of 45 out of the 50 real estate investment trusts (REITs) and business trusts (BTs) listed on SGX were assessed. Eagle Hospitality Trust (EHT) was not included because it is suspended and its annual report was only issued after the cut-off date.
Two trusts are new to GIFT in the 2020 edition, Prime US REIT and ARA US Hospitality Trust, which debut at joint 10th and 24th place respectively.
The top-ranked trusts n GIFT 2020 are Netlink NBN Trust, Keppel DC REIT, AIMS APAC REIT, CapitaLand Commercial Trust, Manulife US REIT and Mapletree North Asia Commercial Trust (the latter three trusts in joint fourth place).
At the other end, the six lowest-ranked trusts are Asian Pay Television Trust, First REIT (joint fifth last), Lippo Malls Indonesia Retail Trust, Accordia Golf Trust, Dasin Retail Trust and Hutchison Port Holdings Trust, with the lowest score of 39 obtained by Hutchison Port Holdings Trust.
This year, we used annual reports published between October 2019 and August 2020. The cut-off date for the data collection was extended to 31 August 2020. However, the AGMs covered were held from October 2019 to September 2020.
One change in GIFT 2020 is that we have used the latest available quarterly/half-yearly results to assess business risks to make GIFT even more timely. All but one of the trusts were assessed based on the June 2020 results or operational/financial update. The only exception was a REIT that published its third quarter results that ended on 31 May 2020.
In 2018, we started providing an opportunity for trusts to submit a self-assessment which we take into account in our assessment. This year, trusts were able to do this online and we are pleased that 35 out of 45 trusts, or 78%, participated in the self-assessment. This is the highest participation rate so far. We would like to thank those who responded and look forward to their continuing engagement.
This year, we decided to focus even more on substance and recognise trusts going beyond the bare minimum, rather than mere disclosure and practices which trusts would be expected to have anyway, such as the existence of a website.
Some new merit and demerit items were introduced. We also made adjustments to the scorecard take into account changes in regulation and the impact of COVID-19 on meetings.
Given all the changes made, the scores for this year are not directly comparable to those in previous years.
The raising of the bar contributed to the average combined governance and business risk score falling from 68 in 2019 to 64.3 this year.
Prof Mak said: “With the sector having matured, increasing consolidation, more trusts venturing overseas and the debacle involving Eagle Hositality Trust, it is important that corporate governance standards be raised and changing risks be adequately recognised so that the good work done by MAS and SGX in building up the sector in the past decade is not undone. While there are some areas of improvement, we feel that overall, standards have somewhat stagnated, regressed or not met expectations.”
Mr Chew Yi Hong, who co-produced the GIFT ranking, said, “Investors need to be more discerning and examine the track record of the managers/trustee-managers in creating value for unitholders. The incentives for the managers may not be aligned with the interests of unitholders although REIT managers and their directors have a legal obligation to act in the best interests of unitholders and prioritise unitholders’ interests over those of the REIT manager and its shareholders.”
The key areas where trusts excelled or improved:
- posting of AGM minutes although this was mostly due to COVID-19 measures introduced by ACRA, MAS and SGX which require issuers holding meetings under these measures to do so
- disclosure of exact remuneration of non-executive directors
- disclosure of performance measures used to determine the remuneration of the CEO, with often more details, and more trusts stating that they use key performance indicators that better aligned management’s interest to unitholders’ interest
- having a remuneration framework that includes a long-term remuneration component
- providing longer notice period for their meetings following guidance provided by the regulators
- in the business risk section, REITs promptly disclosing their interest coverage ratio (ICR) as required by MAS, with generally healthy ICRs
- on average, REITs and BTs are still well financed
Areas where trusts can do better or pay more attention to include:
- allowing unitholders to endorse the appointment of directors, or even better, allow them to elect or propose directors
- giving more weight to perception of independence of directors by avoiding minimum compliance with the letter of the rules
- improving competencies of the board and management to ensure that they add value, including as trusts expand overseas, and also on key board committees such as audit committees where there are chairs who do not appear to have the requisite experience or expertise in accounting or financial management
- improving diversity of boards in terms of gender, ethnicity and age
- having nominating and remuneration committees, or a combined one
- continuing with quarterly reporting or at least informative quarterly updates
- disclosure of remuneration of executive directors, CEOs and key management personnel
- improving alignment of interest in areas such as remuneration policy and fees paid to manager
- avoiding holding meetings on peak days of the AGM season
- although on average, trusts are still well financed, there is a need to pay more attention to business risks relating to areas such as leverage, interest coverage, foreign currency, interest rate changes, lease expiry and use of hybrid securities, as the sector moves from a focus on stability and income/cash generation to a focus on growth
The report this year also includes an overall review of the sector which trusts and investors may be interested in. This review highlights some specific issues, often applicable only to a few trusts, but which may nevertheless impact the sector over time.
The full report and scoring guidelines are available at www.governanceforstakeholders.com.
Governance Index For Trusts – October 2020
Ranking |
REIT/BT | Governance risk Score | Business
risk Score |
GIFT
2020 |
1 | NetLink NBN Trust | 71 | 19 | 90 |
2 | Keppel DC REIT | 57 | 18.5 | 75.5 |
3 | AIMS APAC REIT | 53 | 22 | 75 |
4 | CapitaLand Commercial Trust | 52 | 22 | 74 |
Manulife US REIT | 54 | 20 | 74 | |
Mapletree North Asia Commercial Trust | 56.5 | 17.5 | 74 | |
7 | CapitaLand Mall Trust | 52.5 | 21 | 73.5 |
Far East Hospitality Trust | 56.5 | 17 | 73.5 | |
Parkway Life REIT | 52.5 | 21 | 73.5 | |
10 | Cromwell European REIT | 55 | 18 | 73 |
Keppel Pacific Oak US REIT | 51 | 22 | 73 | |
Prime US REIT | 51 | 22 | 73 | |
13 | Mapletree Industrial Trust | 48 | 24 | 72 |
14 | Mapletree Commercial Trust | 48 | 23 | 71 |
15 | Keppel REIT | 58 | 12.5 | 70.5 |
16 | Soilbuild Business Space REIT | 56 | 13.5 | 69.5 |
17 | Ascendas REIT | 51.5 | 17 | 68.5 |
Frasers Centrepoint Trust | 48.5 | 20 | 68.5 | |
19 | IREIT Global | 49 | 19 | 68 |
20 | Frasers Logistics & Commercial Trust | 46.5 | 20.5 | 67 |
21 | Mapletree Logistics Trust | 47.5 | 19 | 66.5 |
22 | Ascendas India Trust | 47.5 | 18.5 | 66 |
BHG Retail REIT | 51 | 15 | 66 | |
24 | ARA US Hospitality Trust | 48.5 | 15 | 63.5 |
CDL Hospitality Trusts | 45 | 18.5 | 63.5 | |
26 | First Ship Lease Trust | 49.5 | 13 | 62.5 |
Keppel Infrastructure Trust | 50.5 | 12 | 62.5 | |
28 | CapitaLand Retail China Trust | 45.5 | 16 | 61.5 |
ESR-REIT | 44.5 | 17 | 61.5 | |
30 | Starhill Global REIT | 42 | 19 | 61 |
SPH REIT | 47.5 | 13.5 | 61 | |
32 | Frasers Hospitality Trust | 43 | 17.5 | 60.5 |
Sabana REIT | 45.5 | 15 | 60.5 | |
34 | Sasseur REIT | 43.5 | 16.5 | 60 |
35 | Ascott Residence Trust | 43 | 16.5 | 59.5 |
36 | ARA LOGOS Logistics Trust | 44 | 12.5 | 56.5 |
37 | EC World REIT | 43.5 | 12 | 55.5 |
Suntec REIT | 43.5 | 12 | 55.5 | |
39 | OUE Commercial REIT | 42 | 12.5 | 54.5 |
40 | Asian Pay Television Trust | 41 | 9.5 | 50.5 |
First REIT | 37 | 13.5 | 50.5 | |
42 | Lippo Malls Indonesia Retail Trust | 46 | 1.5 | 47.5 |
43 | Accordia Golf Trust | 32 | 13.5 | 45.5 |
44 | Dasin Retail Trust | 34 | 11 | 45 |
45 | Hutchison Port Holdings Trust | 34 | 5 | 39 |
Note: The main Governance score and Business risk score add up to 75 and 25 points respectively.